In today's world, Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability has acquired unprecedented relevance, becoming a topic of interest to a wide range of people and disciplines. Whether it is Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability as a prominent figure in history, as a key concept in a field of study, or as a significant event today, his impact is undeniable. In this article, we will delve into the universe of Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability, exploring its origins, evolution and its influence on various aspects of society. From its appearance to its contemporary relevance, Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability has been the subject of analysis and debate, generating a vast wealth of knowledge that deserves to be explored in detail.
Wikimedia subject-area collaboration
"WP:WPRE" redirects here. For WikiProject Resource Exchange, see WP:WRE.
This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
Do you have an article/fact/reference that needs checking? See the guidelines for help with tagging articles for review and correction.
Do you need help creating citations? See the Referencing for beginners and Citing sources pages for information on how to write references and create citations
Do you want to help improve the reliability of Wikipedia? Lend a hand with some of the open tasks, and add your name to the participants list.
Do you have a question? Please feel free to comment on the project talk page, and someone will try to help as soon as possible!
Give me something simple to do! There are over 519,204 "Citation needed" statements on Wikipedia. Click here to use the Citation Hunt tool which makes it easy to pick one to fix.
Add perennial sources that are missing from the page
Index new discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard
Update entries when noticeboard discussions are archived
Guidelines
Articles with no references
For an article with nocitations, add the template {{unreferenced}} to the beginning of the article to flag it for review and addition of citations. This will automatically add the article to Category:Articles lacking sources.
If the article has only one reference or external link (that is related to the article content), use {{one source}} to put the article in Category:Articles lacking sources.
There are a number of different Wikipedia Backlog categories that help track the existing backlog of referencing activities. They fall into two major groups, Lacking references and Ensuring accuracy through existing references.
At the moment, there are over 519,204 articles with "Citation needed" statements. They are some of the easiest referencing issues to solve, because you are frequently looking for a targeted and singular reference. You can browse the whole list of these articles at Category:All articles with unsourced statements.
With 519,204 statements that need WP:Verification, sometimes it's hard to choose which article to work on. The tool Citation Hunt makes that easier by suggesting random articles, which you can sort by topical category membership.
Hi, WikiProject Reliability! Thanks for ensuring that articles are supported by reliable sources. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles.
If you would like to participate, please visit WikiProject Reliability for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Participants". Thanks! ~~~~
This article is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ReliabilityWikipedia:WikiProject ReliabilityTemplate:WikiProject ReliabilityReliability articles
The Barnstar of Reliability is awarded to editors whose contributions improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. To award this barnstar, click the WikiLove heart icon at the top of a user talk page (on a desktop or laptop computer), choose "Make your own", and use Barnstar of Reliability.png as the image filename.
Barnstar of Reliability
The Barnstar of Reliability is awarded to editors whose contributions improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. To award this barnstar, click the WikiLove heart icon at the top of a user talk page (on a desktop or laptop computer), choose "Make your own", and use Barnstar of Reliability - BoNM.png as the image filename.
See also
Tools
Citation Hunt - gamifying adding sources to uncited statements