Wikipedia:Training/For educators/Week 9

This article will address the topic of Wikipedia:Training/For educators/Week 9 from a broad and detailed perspective, with the aim of providing the reader with a comprehensive and deep vision of this matter. Different aspects and points of view related to Wikipedia:Training/For educators/Week 9 will be analyzed, taking into account its relevance in the current context and its impact in various fields. Through this journey, we will seek to offer relevant information, enriching reflections and possible solutions or alternatives to address Wikipedia:Training/For educators/Week 9 efficiently and effectively.


  Wikipedia Training  
  Classroom  
          Menu     Resources     Page 33 of 42


Week 9: Getting and giving feedback

Professor Ruppel knows collaboration is a critical element of contributing to Wikipedia, and while some students have experienced feedback from Wikipedians concerning ideas, copy-edits, or even substantial contributions to the students' articles, others have seen little editing from the Wikipedia community.

Fortunately, a class full of fellow learners is a great pool of peer reviewers. So students begin to review each others' articles soon after full-length drafts are posted, to give everyone plenty of time to act on the advice of their peers.

Professor Ruppel encourages the students to focus their peer reviews on specific issues that can be improved. Since students are usually hesitant to criticize their classmates, she gives examples of the kinds of constructively critical feedback that are the most helpful.

previous page               next page   12       11       10       9       8       7       6       5       4       3       2       1    

Click the highlighted week to view details.