Wikipedia:Shirt58's Law

Today, Wikipedia:Shirt58's Law is a topic of great relevance and interest. Since its emergence, it has captured the attention of many people and has become a point of discussion in various areas. This phenomenon has sparked the interest of experts and enthusiasts alike, generating extensive debate about its implications and consequences. Wikipedia:Shirt58's Law has proven to have a significant impact on modern society, and its influence is becoming increasingly evident in different aspects of daily life. In this article, we will thoroughly explore Wikipedia:Shirt58's Law and its relevance in the current context, analyzing its evolution, challenges and possible future scenarios.
Shirt58's Law

If a new article or draft article contains text like "we are (organisation/website/something else like that)" you can be pretty much be sure it was copied and pasted from that (organisation/website/something else like that) website, and is blatant advertising.

Henry IV liked the royal we – but he didn't write encyclopedia articles.

There once was an admin named Peter
Whose Lim'ricks most often kept meter.
There's a previous law
That his essay foresaw:
If a page uses "we" – we'll delete 'er!

Wikipedia, like all encyclopedias, is written in the third person and English passive voice, such as Poland is a country located in Central Europe, or The uncertainty principle is any of a variety of mathematical inequalities asserting a fundamental limit to the precision with which the values for certain pairs of physical quantities of a particle, such as position, x, and momentum, p, can be predicted from initial conditions (and ... breathe ... and relax).

Articles don't use I, you or we, so if you see those, chances are the article's purpose was more to help its writer than to improve Wikipedia. For example, We often introduces promotional gibberish such as "We are committed to blue-sky thinking in order to maximise our throughput as we touch base with our clients, leverage the appropriate synergies, and actualise win-win positions". If an article looks like it's been copied and pasted from somewhere like that, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Massacre it.

Phrases such as "We have found" can also show undue reliance on WP:PRIMARY scientific sources.

  1. ^ Though there are exceptions: see Language of mathematics#The grammar of mathematics. If you're at the level of those, though, you probably don't need this essay.