In the following article, we will delve into the fascinating world of
Wikipedia:Requests for verification. From its origins to its impact today, we will explore all aspects related to
Wikipedia:Requests for verification. Along these lines, we will analyze its importance, its challenges and its possible solutions.
Wikipedia:Requests for verification is a topic that has generated great interest in different areas, and that is why in this article we will try to address it in the most complete and objective way possible. In addition, we will place special emphasis on its relevance to society in general, highlighting its influence on various aspects of our daily lives. Join us on this tour of
Wikipedia:Requests for verification and discover everything this theme has to offer!
| This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
|
Drafting template
Suggested usage
- {{Requests for verification}} ({{RFV}}) should be used only on articles that have no sources. If there are Any references supporting the article then do not use {{RFV}} you may consider the {{Refimprove}} template which is appropriate for articles with some sources but not enough.
- Wikipedia Requests for verification {{RFV}} places articles in category:Requests for verification categorizing by date as {{Prod}} does.
- {{RFV}} should not be used on articles with history before January 1, 2007
- {{uw-unsor1}}, {{uw-unsor2}}, {{uw-unsor3}} should be placed on the talk page of the original editor of an unreferenced article that is tagged with {{RFV}}
- There should be at least 30 days between the tag and deletion
Deletion instructions
Before deleting the article, check:
- 1. Does the article history (first edit) begin after January 1, 2007?
- No, it begins before January 1, 2007: Remove the RFV tag and do not delete
- Yes: continue
- 2. Has the RFV tag been on the article for at least 30 days?
- No, it has been less then 30 days: stop and allow editors to improve the article
- Yes: continue
- 3. Are there any references, external links, or mentions of sources anywhere in the article?
- 4. Delete the article.
Rationale
It is appropriate to provide warning and allow time for editors to improve articles and add references. Current we have Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research and messages like "Articles that do not cite reliable published sources are likely to be deleted." when you open an edit screen to make a NEW ARTICLE. It is reasonable to argue that any content or articles added since January 1, 2007 (when older articles were added there was not a verification requirement) that are unreferenced are posted directly in violation of Wikipedia policy. In Wiktionary new unreferenced articles are tagged with {{rfv}} which reads
The process that this suggestion is based on is at Wiktionary:Requests for verification.