Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship
Nowadays, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship is a topic of great relevance and that arouses great interest in society. For some time now, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship has been the subject of debate and controversy, since its influence is palpable in different areas of daily life. Whether in politics, economics, culture or science, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship has managed to carve out a niche for itself and position itself as one of the hottest topics today. Throughout history, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship has marked a before and after in the way we see the world, triggering significant changes that have directly impacted society. This article aims to shed light on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship and analyze its impact on society today, as well as in the past and future.
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Closed - This isn't funny, this isn't original, it's just stupid, and don't tell me to lighten up, because I won't hear of it. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Obviously, this page is broken beyond repair. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Totally serious, anti-April Fools' Day delete. Actually, why not? After Salvio giuliano's RFA, maybe it is time to delete RFA and start over. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs • Editor review) 02:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect to WP:NOTNOW. 28bytes (talk) 02:13, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I see April Fool's day nominations as prima facie evidence of being unfunny. </Kmweber> In all seriousness, Delete per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:13, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- YES Let me quote Jimbo, "RFA is a horrible and broken process". :D Bejinhan talks 02:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose because you all love me and might never hear from me again. Keepscases (talk) 02:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.