Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ The Golden Eagle

In this article we are going to delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ The Golden Eagle and explore all its facets. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ The Golden Eagle is a fundamental aspect of daily life and throughout history it has played a crucial role in society. From Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ The Golden Eagle it has impacted the way people relate to each other, to its influence on technological and scientific advances. Over the next few lines, we'll take an in-depth look at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ The Golden Eagle and how it has shaped our world in ways that often go unnoticed. Get ready to immerse yourself in a journey through the complexity and importance of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ The Golden Eagle in our lives!
Original - The Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos is one of the best known birds of prey in the Northern Hemisphere. Like all eagles, it belongs to the family Accipitridae.
Reason
Great photo with really nice detial.
Articles this image appears in
Golden Eagle
Creator
Richard Bartz
  • Support as nominator CPacker (talk) 00:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose It's nice, but the EV isn't immediately clear to me. The beak and eyes, which are all you can see in this photo, are barely discussed in the article (only the mouth is mentioned, and only to say "the mouth is only used for eating). What does the reader gain from this photo, other than "wow, that's a really nice picture"? SingCal 01:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support--Mbz1 (talk) 01:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose While it is a very nice, clear photo. It doesn't really add any value to the article. There are plenty of other photos of the golden eagle, and there is an even better one of the eagle's head already on the page. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 19:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Support Quality photo. However, the subject matter is 'eagle head' which is partially cropped. So information value wise its marginal. If another close up 'eagle head' shot comes around (of equal quality and improved content) this one can always be delisted I suppose. --Mike Spenard (talk) 07:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
  • 'Oppose per ErgoSum88. Narayanese (talk) 00:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Not promoted MER-C 02:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)