In this article, we are going to explore
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paris and everything it has to offer. From its origins to its impact on today's society, we will dive into a comprehensive analysis of
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paris and its relevance in different aspects of life. We will discover how
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paris has evolved over time and how it has left a mark on history. Additionally, we will examine how
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paris has changed the way people interact and relate to each other. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive view of
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paris and its influence in today's world. Get ready to immerse yourself in the fascinating world of
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paris!
I think this article should benominated because it is rich in detail. It is interesting to many people. This article is also rich in photos. (nominated by Wikipedian231 13:13, 17 Feb 2005 )
- Object for now - please do something about the two ugly preformatted tables and merge the two timelines (the timeline and population history may each be better placed in a separate page). -- ALoan (Talk) 13:44, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Fixed the population. David.Monniaux 15:52, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. Still object - on another look, there are lots of single-sentence paragraphs or lists which could be explained or expanded upon (I know there are several subsidiary "Main article"s, but they could be summarised more fully here too). The lead section is also rather inadequate. Does it (should it?) be consistent with Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities, and would Template:Infobox City be useful? -- ALoan (Talk) 16:37, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Object. ALoan mentions the main problems already, but also there are no references. These are basic requirement for featured articles, so please do not nominate articles without them. They will not pass. Suggest to refer to peer review. Jeronimo 08:34, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Object. Agree with the above. Its like we're sharing the same mind. - Taxman 16:48, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)