Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 November 14

In the current context, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 November 14 has become a relevant topic of great interest to society. Over time, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 November 14 has gained importance and has generated a great impact in different areas, from politics to technology. That is why it is crucial to fully explore all the dimensions and repercussions that Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 November 14 has in our modern world. In this article, we will delve into the analysis and study of Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 November 14, addressing its origins, evolution and its influence in different sectors. Furthermore, we will reflect on the future implications that Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 November 14 could have on society and how these can best be addressed.
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

You (Schiller song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD))

The single was released and entered the charts. Sources: , , , , Jonny84 (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I've already added sources for the German Singles Chart () and the Austrian Singles Chart. Both are official national charts. The single peaked at #19 in Germany and at #63 in Austria. Further sources: , , . Futher informations about the single: http://www.discogs.com/release/1516556 Jonny84 (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Endorse deletion. I can see from the links that it has charted now. However, (quoting WP:MUSIC#Songs): "Most songs do not merit an article... Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article is only appropriate on a song when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article (my emphasis); articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album". This single is clearly not meriting of its own article at this time. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 22:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
I've found a few informations , , , , , to expand the article. articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album" - sure, but the article was deleted instead of making a redirection so I couldn't merge it to any article. Note that the version in the cache is older than the deleted version. Jonny84 (talk) 00:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. Given the sources cited in this DRV, I would support userfication or history restoration behind a redirect to facilitate merging any appropriate material. While it still doesn't meet the guidelines as a stand-alone single material about this song should be covered in an article about the album it came from. Eluchil404 (talk) 21:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.