Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot

In today's world, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot is a topic that is becoming increasingly relevant and interesting. From its impact on society to its influence on people's daily lives, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot has become a recurring theme in debates, conversations and analysis. As we move forward in time, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot continues to generate deep reflection in different areas, from politics and economics to culture and technology. This is why it is essential to address this issue in a deep and detailed way, to understand its scope and to be able to understand its true impact on our lives. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot, addressing its importance and meaning today.


The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Chris G Bot

Operator: Chris G

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic with Supervision
Programming Language(s): Perl using PerlWikipedia
Function Summary: The bot updates Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/AfD with the content in Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily
Edit rate requested: X edits per TIME 1-3 edits a day
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: See Here

Discussion

Yup I'm the bot op also take a look here. --Chris g 03:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Cool; thanks. Otherwise, the routine looks good; I'd like to see the source code, but a trial will do. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 03:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Ok I've Completed the source code can I have a trial run? --Chris g 11:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Go ahead and trial for up to a week, let us know how it goes here. — xaosflux Talk 05:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
To use the proper template, Approved for trial (7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Any news? Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Nevermind, I misread the date. Any more bugs, or can I approve this? {{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
I got all the bugs out so you can approve. --Chris g 10:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Are you sure? You had to fix the last bot edit. ~ Wikihermit 17:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

The trial was for seven days, and I think you should continue it. It looks like you had a very rocky development process, and as you had to fix the bot's last edit, I don't know that the bugs are out. Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete., for seven days more. The burden of proof is on you to prove that the bot is harmless and useful. — madman bum and angel 17:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

(Sorry if I'm not meant to post here) Would it be possible to include a wikilink in the bot's edit summary? I'd find that convenient. Thanks either way, Giggy Talk | Review 01:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree. --Boricuaeddie 01:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Do you have any more remaining bugs (that you know of), or is this ready to approve? Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 22:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
All done! You may now aprove -- Chris G  talk  10:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 Approved. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 23:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia