Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow Light of Death

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to PlayStation 3#Reliability. Tone 12:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Yellow Light of Death (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not establish notability to justify the article or cite any sources. The one that was provided was to Yahoo! Answers - Essentially a forum/messageboard which are not reliable. Suggest redirecting to PlayStation 3#Reliability which covers the issue sufficiently. Chimpanzee - User | Talk | Contribs 18:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

• Delete - Completely frivolous to have this as a separate article. The entirety of this information could and should be contained in the Playstation 3 article. - OldManNeptune (talk) 23:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - Could easily be incorporated into main PlayStation 3 article. scope_creep (talk) 20:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Completely an opinion piece (saying the new model hasn't improved at all) under the guise of an actual article. This element is already in the PS3 article and so many other things go wrong with it (loss of Blu-ray playback, internet connectivity and such) that this is one of the smaller issues with the console. Nate • (chatter) 19:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
• Delete - pointless article whose content should be in the main PS3 article. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
• Redirect to PlayStation 3#Reliability. Plausible search term, but this hasn't received the coverage that the red ring of death has. We also had a previous AfD that was pretty much the same thing (may have been reworded), closing in a redirect. --Teancum (talk) 09:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
• Redirect per nominator (why bring to AfD?). As Teancum says, this is a plausible search term as evidenced by the BBC reference. Marasmusine (talk) 21:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.