Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasa Denticity

In this article, we will explore the broad and diverse topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasa Denticity. From its origins to its relevance today, we will embark on a fascinating journey that will allow us to better understand this important topic. Over the next few lines, we will analyze various aspects related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasa Denticity, such as its impact on society, its evolution over time and the possible implications it has for the future. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasa Denticity is a fascinating topic that arouses the interest of people of all ages and backgrounds, and this article seeks to delve into its meaning and relevance.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 00:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Vasa Denticity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability. The closest GNG appearing source is #1 which appears to be a copy of their self-bio. The others are just financial announcements etc. Creater is indeffed for COI promotional editing. North8000 (talk) 15:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.