In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust Technology has become a topic of widespread interest. From its impact on society to its relevance in the professional field,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust Technology has captured the attention of people of all ages and cultures. With endless opinions and perspectives surrounding
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust Technology, it is crucial to fully analyze its implications and consequences. In this article, we will explore various aspects related to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust Technology, with the aim of providing a broad and complete overview of this topic. From its origin to its possible future developments, we will take a look at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust Technology from different angles to understand its importance today.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Trust Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. The references are about generically "trusting technology", not something called TrustTech. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete; the term Trust Technology might well exist as a descriptor used with things like blockchain, but this article fails to convince that it's also known as TrustTech or that it's sufficiently well-defined to be the subject of an article without the creator first having to resort to OR to define what they're writing about. The reference used to support the idea that the term TrustTech was coined by Javelyn/Javelin technologies doesn't even mention the term. This article has degenerated into a rather fuzzy essay on trust in the technology industry (and beyond) followed by a link-farm of random items that people would like us to believe are trustworthy. Elemimele (talk) 12:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I guess it's a sort of personal essay on the topic, coining (and heavily leaning on) the term TrustTech? A very odd page. I don't think there's anything salvageable for the encyclopedia here sadly. Ajpolino (talk) 04:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.