Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparency Market Research

In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparency Market Research has become a topic of increasing interest to people of all ages and backgrounds. Whether due to its impact on society, its historical relevance or its influence on popular culture, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparency Market Research has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. In this article, we will explore the importance of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparency Market Research in depth, analyzing its evolution over time and examining its impact on different aspects of everyday life. From its emergence to its current relevance, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparency Market Research has much to offer in terms of reflection and understanding of the world around us.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Transparency Market Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable market research firm. No reliable in-depth coverage about the firm itself found. Their so-called research is primarily used as reference for questionable economic forecasts by trade associations, trade magazines and other PR publications. GermanJoe (talk) 19:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.