Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Tayback (2nd nomination)

Today, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Tayback (2nd nomination) is a highly relevant topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. With the advancement of technology and globalization, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Tayback (2nd nomination) has become a constant point of discussion in everything from politics to pop culture. This article will seek to analyze in depth the impact of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Tayback (2nd nomination) on contemporary society, exploring its different facets and how it has come to influence our lives in ways we may not have even considered before. Through testimonies, studies and expert opinions, it is intended to shed light on this topic and offer readers a complete and updated vision of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Tayback (2nd nomination).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Tom Tayback

AfDs for this article:

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Tom Tayback (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Previously deleted in 2017. Edwardx (talk) 09:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

The filmography lists four films, but none of them show significant roles:

Film Significant Role
The Hidden II Not mentioned in article No
Undercover Heat No article, only a redirect to a list No
Jimi, 1996 No article No
Grizzly Adams and the Legend of Dark Mountain No article No

A review of the references shows that they may be the results of a naïve Google search. They all reference to the subject, which means that the search was properly done. They are also all properly formatted, which show that the author has read Referencing for Beginners. None of them are independent significant secondary coverage. The references are all consistent with the article, in backing up the run-of-the-mill career that is documented in the article.

Number Reference Remarks Independent Significant Reliable Secondary
1 Graffiti Gold Show Ad for a show, with a link about the subject as one of the performers' No No
2 Graffiti Gold Show Another page similar to 1 No No
3 Open Powerlifting List of results in a powerlifting competition No No No
4 Open Powerlifting List of results in another powerlifting competition No No No
5 Cliffiestone A blog page which discusses a meeting with the subject No No No
6 Open Powerlifting A list of all of the subject's results in competitions No No
7 Graffiti Gold Show Ad for a show, with a bio sketch of the subject as one of the performers No No
8 MUBI.com Documents a non-significant movie role No No No
9 Moviefit.me Describes another non-significant movie role No No No
10 Binged.com Lists non-significant movie roles No No No
11 Pinterest.ca Describes a non-significant movie role, and is user-provided content No No No No
12 Film Affinity.com Describes a role in a non-notable movie, and is a social medium No No No No
13 Moviefit.me Describes role in another non-significant movie No No No
14 KAZM Radio.com Web site of the subject's radio station No No

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia