Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Lehmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Thomas Lehmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game designer with no third-party coverage. Article contains a large amount of red links and its only citation since its 2006 creation has been a self-published source. The few games therein that have articles are also lacking in independent coverage. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 02:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Subject doesn’t pass notability guidelines his only reference is about top 100 games not him. Nothing on internet referring to the subject. Australianblackbelt (talk) 10:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:BEFORE search finds nothing. Does not appear to pass WP:GNG on his own. Red Phoenix ^talk 05:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.