On this occasion, we want to delve into the exciting world of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin, a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. Since its inception,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin has been the object of debate, study and admiration, becoming a fundamental element in modern life. Over the years,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin has significantly impacted different areas, from technology to culture, science and society in general. In this article, we will explore the many facets of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin, as well as its influence on the contemporary world, with the aim of shedding light on its relevance and offering a comprehensive view on this exciting topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy withdrawn. convinced by the many reputable sources found during the deletion debate (non-admin closure) Ysangkok (talk) 16:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WIth only two short mentions in reputable media (LATimes and NYTimes), coverage per WP:FILM has not been established. The synopsis is all original research, and the only sourced material is meta stuff like how the the film was developed. Since there is not enough source material to have a meaningful article, this article must be deleted. Ysangkok (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Leaning keep, actually - NYT review is a proper review, there's Hollywood Reporter, an interview with the director ... it's marginal, but there's sufficient coverage for a short article - David Gerard (talk) 08:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. I found reviews from Variety, Under the Radar, and Common Sense Media. CSM isn't the super strongest but it's generally seen as a RS for reviews. It's enough to pass NFILM. In all fairness, the reviews did take quite a bit of digging through false positives and junk results on Google to find due to the title being a fairly common article title for general Bitcoin discussion. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.