Today, we want to delve into a topic that concerns us all:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pique Poquette of Paris. Whether we are talking about the importance of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pique Poquette of Paris in our daily lives, or the challenges
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pique Poquette of Paris faces in the modern world, it is a topic that deserves our attention. From its origins to its impact on today's society,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pique Poquette of Paris offers us endless possibilities to reflect and learn. Therefore, it is crucial that we explore this topic in depth, analyzing its different facets and seeking to draw conclusions that allow us to better understand its relevance in our daily lives.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of The Inspector cartoons#1966. Been up 3 weeks, The keep !vote is basically a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, Redirect is preferred over deletion so that's the best argument I see here. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 18:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- The Pique Poquette of Paris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable individual episode Gaijin42 (talk) 19:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep If I was asked originally, I would say that we need one page for the series, and the rest should be included in it. But as many of the previous series have separate pages, then this would remain. Shad Innet (talk) 11:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.