Today we want to talk about
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orbit Room, a topic that has gained relevance in recent years and that has generated great interest in society.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orbit Room is an issue that affects people of all ages, genders and social classes, and its importance lies in the multiple aspects it covers. From its impact on the economy to its influence on culture and everyday life,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orbit Room has become a central topic today. In this article, we will analyze different aspects related to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orbit Room, from its origin to its possible solutions, with the aim of offering a comprehensive and in-depth vision of this topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- The Orbit Room (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable local bar. A celebrity owner doesn't confer notability. Several reviews available as sources, but these don't convey the significant coverage demanded by WP:GNG. Doesn't meet WP:CORP. Deserves a sentence or two in the owner's article -- which is already there. Mikeblas (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, without prejudice against recreation of a redirect to Alex Lifeson if desired. To be clear, I live in Toronto, so I've certainly heard of and even been to the Orbit Room myself — but the fact that it exists isn't an automatic notability freebie in and of itself in the absence of sufficient sourcing to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH, having an owner who's famous for other reasons still doesn't boost its notability in the absence of sufficent sourcing to pass GNG and CORPDEPTH, and even on a ProQuest search for older media coverage that wouldn't google, I just get a lot of glancing namechecks of its existence in event calendar listings with no discernible evidence of the kind of coverage about it that would be needed to pass GNG and CORPDEPTH. Bearcat (talk) 15:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.