Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Girl and the Dreamcatcher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

The Girl and the Dreamcatcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed. Per WP:NBAND, nothing has charted, one mention in a gossip mag and other info is personal pages of principals. Looks like a vanity project for two celebrities Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. If there is anything worth keeping it can be moved to the articles of the respective members. rʨanaɢ (talk) 05:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Clearly not even generally notable (GNG). SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:TOOSOON. It looks a nice new band and we wish them well but they haven't attained notability yet. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as unfortunately WP:TOOSOON, For some reason I really want this kept but there's nothing notability-wise so will have to say Delete for now, No objections to recreation once better sources pop up. –Davey2010^Talk 00:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.