Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thai Life Permanent Exhibition Hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Thailand Cultural Centre#Facilities. Seems the logical solution DGG ( talk ) 03:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Thai Life Permanent Exhibition Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. unreferenced for 3 years. nothing in gnews. 5 gbooks hits. ], only 1 could be considered indepth. but you would expect an active exhibition hall to at least get some newspaper coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:ORG There are articles that summarize the Hall, but no articles whatsoever to suggest notability. --TimL (talk) 08:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

• Merge to Thailand Cultural Center of which it appears to be a part (more here). There's some info on an official Thai site which seems to provide some legitimacy to it, although I don't think it warrants its own article. StarM 02:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
  • ETA already mentioned there. Just redirect. It's a valid search term. StarM 02:34, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I would agree with star that a redirect would be best, given what he turned up. The reason I declined the prod initially was the combination of the one 200 pageish book about it, and the fact that, presumably, most sources will be in Thai. I would not expect an average notable exhibition hall in a non-anglophone country to necessarily have any english language newspaper coverage. Kevin (talk) 00:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.