Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Millstein

In today's article we are going to talk about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Millstein, a topic that has generated great interest in recent times. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Millstein is a topic that has been the subject of debate and discussion in different areas, whether in the academic field, in the political field or in society in general. Throughout this article we will delve into the different aspects related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Millstein, from its origins to its relevance today. We will explore different perspectives and opinions, with the aim of providing a comprehensive view on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Millstein and its impact on society. We are sure that this article will be of great interest to all those who wish to delve into the complexity of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Millstein and better understand its importance in today's world.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 17:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Ted Millstein

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Ted Millstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doubtful notability. I removed the "refs" that don't actually say anything about the subject, and that doesn't leave a whole lot. PepperBeast (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

  • Delete The article was promotional to begin with. City Life reporter Victor Fiorillo rightly questions why this local lawyer has a Wikipedia page. After the tax evasion sentence, it became embarrassing but, in my view, not necessarily notable. Deleting the article does Mr. Millstein a favor. The article should have been deleted long ago.
Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia