Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan M. Boyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Susan M. Boyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable writer, does not meet WP:ARTIST. Like many writers, she has written books; like many of those, she has been published. Neither in itself constitutes notability. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:38, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

• Keep The LA Times article is one exapmle of the very substantial coverage of this and her work. The award is also significant (perhaps not enough on its own, but it adds to notability). Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
• Keep Per Candleabracadabra. The Agatha Award is prestigious and significant. With the LA Times her notability has been established. JSFarman (talk) 17:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets 4(c) of WP:ARTIST as the recipient of an Agatha Award. gobonobo ^{+ c} 02:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.