In this article we will explore
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supergirl (Matrix) in order to delve into its meaning, impact and relevance in the current context.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supergirl (Matrix) is a topic that has aroused great interest throughout history, generating debates, research and reflections in various areas. Throughout these pages, we will analyze the different perspectives on
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supergirl (Matrix), as well as the implications it has on today's society. From its origin to its possible future developments, this article seeks to offer a comprehensive vision of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supergirl (Matrix), with the aim of enriching knowledge and encouraging critical reflection on this topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Supergirl#Matrix. ✗plicit 12:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Supergirl (Matrix) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Why this Supergirl variant/plotline deserves a dedicated entry? The article is just a pure plot summary, with no reception/significance, and references are all primary (comic books), except a single forum post... In other words, the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. I am not even sure what would be a good redirect target, and whether there is anything here that could be salvaged by merging; Supergirl#Matrix is entirely unreferenced and adding primary "references" from here there would be just a wiki window dressing... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Supergirl#Matrix where she is already covered. The current article is nothing but plot summary (even the "Behind the Scenes" section doesn't actually provide any actual analysis, and is mostly WP:OR), and searches did not bring up much beyond plot summaries outside of brief mentions in discussions of Supergirl's overall history. To further confuse things, many sources (and this article itself) conflates the "Matrix" version with the Linda Danvers version, who has a separate article already. So, in short, this article is really specifically about the version of Supergirl that is simply the Matrix version before merging with Linda Danvers, which there does not appear to be enough coverage in reliable sources that a WP:SPLIT from the main article seems justified. Rorshacma (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect - I was set to argue keep, but Rorshacma saved me from that embarrassment by noting that we have a separate article for Linda Danvers. Count me among the people confused by the character's history... Argento Surfer (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.