Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dangle Glynn

Nowadays, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dangle Glynn is a topic that has gained great relevance in society. Whether it's its impact on the economy, its influence on popular culture, or its role in history, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dangle Glynn has captured the attention of people of all ages and backgrounds. Since its emergence, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dangle Glynn has been the subject of debate and analysis, with conflicting opinions giving rise to passionate discussions. In this article, we will explore different aspects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dangle Glynn and its impact on various areas of daily life. Through deep analysis and detailed research, we will seek to better understand the importance of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dangle Glynn and how it has shaped the world we know today.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Steve Dangle Glynn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a sports commentator, based entirely on primary sources with the exception of a single video interview in which he's the interviewee rather than the subject. A person does not get a Wikipedia article on the basis of their own self-published social media presence — they get a Wikipedia article via coverage in which they're the subject of reliable source content written by other people, but no coverage of that type has been shown here. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  18:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.