In this article, we will explore the impact that
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slughorn has had on our society. Since its emergence,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slughorn has generated great interest and debate among experts and the general public. Throughout history,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slughorn has played a crucial role in various aspects of our lives, influencing everything from politics to popular culture. Through detailed analysis, we will examine how
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slughorn has shaped our perceptions and behaviors, as well as its relevance in the contemporary context. Likewise, we will address the future implications of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slughorn and its likely evolution in the coming years.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Hogwarts staff#Horace Slughorn. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Slughorn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely WP:OR. There is no third party coverage of this concept as a whole, and any coverage of the term is focused on trivial mentions, insufficient for notability. An editor has synthesized this original research from several different dictionary-style definitions, most of them unverifiable except for one, which is already covered at another article. Mostly a holdover from 2006, when Wikipedia's standards were much more lax. Jontesta (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Soft redirect to wikt:slughorn, which is a better place for describing this term in a dictionary-like fashion. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 15:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Hogwarts staff#Horace Slughorn. I performed a few searches and it appears that the Harry Potter character is the primary topic – and also the only term on the disambiguation page that's linked to something more substantial about "Slughorn" – but since he doesn't have his own article, redirect to the section about him instead. I'd also support a soft redirect as above if this isn't a clear primary topic. Complex/Rational 01:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Soft redirect to wikt:slughorn per Mellohi. Pretty crazy that this absolute disaster of an article? disambiguation page? what even is it? managed to last as long as it did. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 14:43, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect somewhere. Hard choice given both suggestion above are viable. Can we create a disambig to a fictional character AND wiktionary? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Hogwarts staff#Horace Slughorn This potential target takes priority, per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Hogwarts staff#Horace Slughorn because the character appears to be the clear primary topic. Most of the other definitions do not have as much search prevalence. ‡ Night Watch ω (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.