Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skwatta Kamp

In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skwatta Kamp has become a topic of great relevance and interest to various people around the world. Since its emergence, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skwatta Kamp has captured the attention of experts and enthusiasts alike, generating in-depth debates, research and analysis around its implications and repercussions. With a palpable impact on contemporary society, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skwatta Kamp has managed to permeate different areas of daily life, from politics to popular culture, becoming a phenomenon that leaves no one indifferent. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the various aspects related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skwatta Kamp, its evolution over time and its influence on different aspects of today's society.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Please add new sources to the article. Liz Read! Talk! 21:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Skwatta Kamp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC with no notable discography or chart activity, while their "numerous awards" mentioned in article include only two regional ones. Article has been a poorly-sourced stub since its 2015 creation, and searches turn up the usual niche sites (YouTube, Bandcamp, Genius, et al.) or stories about member deaths. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 00:57, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep Meets notability criterion 3 of WP:BAND (Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country). . Also got coverage from national circulation WP:RS. , and they are described in those RS as "legendary" and "revolutionary" indicating that they meet WP:GNG. Also not sure why all the stories about their members dying etc in WP:RS are not indicative of notability as per nom. WP:NOTCLEANUP applies as well. Park3r (talk) 07:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.