Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Valdez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Shane Valdez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Puff piece on non-notable film-maker. No career to speak of, other than one (very) short film and a friendship with a famous musician. CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

• Week keep CineVegas is a notable enough festival for an award to be significant. I'm still looking in the 48 hours thing (locally to Vegas again). (I removed the ref to the Rolling Stone mag because it didn't mention Valdez while it was used to ref the sentence he did a music vid.) - Mgm|^(talk) 11:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

• Notability is not contagious, especially regarding such a minor festival. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 11:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

• Weak Keep I don't think it's overwhelming. But his films have won awards and I think his biography is worth including. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Awards are from a minor festival. No significant coverage of him or his films (let alone full reviews in reliable sources). Notability guideline not met. Bongomatic 23:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per Bongomatic. BLP riddled with fact tags, fails WP:ENTERTAINER. لennavecia 03:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 11:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.