In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean McCaffrey has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide spectrum of society. Whether due to its impact on the economy, politics, technology or culture,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean McCaffrey has positioned itself as a key point in the discussion and analysis of various aspects of modern life. Since its inception,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean McCaffrey has sparked curiosity and debate, generating conflicting opinions and encouraging the search for solutions and innovations. Throughout history,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean McCaffrey has been the protagonist of countless significant events, marking a before and after in the way in which various topics are conceived and addressed. In this article, we will explore the different dimensions and facets of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean McCaffrey, analyzing its importance and implications in the contemporary world.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was that Sean McCaffrey fails WP:NFOOTBALL and passes the WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- Sean McCaffrey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Football manager who fails WP:NFOOTY (never managed in a fully-pro league or a senior national side), also fails GNG, as external links are purely routine. BlameRuiner (talk) 08:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep a WP:BEFORE search seems to pass WP:GNG: (six months later) or this long tribute: There's also some smaller stuff from his managerial days, but it's clear he was influential in Irish football from the sources provided. SportingFlyer talk 11:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per SportingFlyer. While NFOOTY may be questionable, GNG/SIGCOV is not. Ideally the nominator would complete the activities expected in WP:BEFORE in advance of nominating on "not fully pro league" or "links in article aren't great" grounds. (Notability is not assessed purely on the basis of the links/refs in the article). Guliolopez (talk) 12:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per the above sources. A BEFORE search should always be done before a deletion nom. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 15:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - per the users above, appears to meet WP:GNG even if he doesn't meet WP:NFOOTY. 21.colinthompson (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Fails WP:NFOOTY but passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Doesn't meet any football notability standards, but does seem to pass the GNG.Sandals1 (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as above, meets GNG. GiantSnowman 16:28, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.