In today's article we will explore the fascinating world of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savill Court, Bishopsgate. From its origins to its relevance today,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savill Court, Bishopsgate has been the subject of interest and debate in different areas. Throughout history,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savill Court, Bishopsgate has played a fundamental role in various cultures and societies, influencing the way people perceive the world around them. Through a detailed analysis, we will examine the different aspects that make
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savill Court, Bishopsgate a topic worthy of study and reflection. Likewise, we will explore the implications and applications that
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savill Court, Bishopsgate has in our daily lives, providing a comprehensive and enriching vision of this fascinating topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Savill Court, Bishopsgate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article contains no plausible assertion of the notability of this building: indeed it contains nothing of interest about it, concentrating on the not particularly remarkable inhabitants.TheLongTone (talk) 16:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC) TheLongTone (talk) 16:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment It is not a listed building (checked via http://list.historicengland.org.uk/mapsearch.aspx) and is not mentioned in the Surrey volume of Pevsner's Buildings of England series, which from a notability point of view is not encouraging for a building of the early 19th century. For info, the Bishopsgate in question is a hamlet in the parish of Englefield Green.Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 17:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now, until someone can come up with evidence that the building is of note. It is evidently big and possibly 200 years old, but neither of these things are criteria for notability. There is this brief review of the current hotel in a national newspaper, but that's it. 90% of the article is not about the house, but poorly sourced (and largely off topic) biogs of alleged inhabitants, with heavy doses of WP:OR. I can only guess the article was written by someone connected to the hotel. Because it is largely not about the building, I don't believe this article will be missed. Sionk (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG; the entire article is about the people who lived there. There is nothing about the building except the mention that there was remodeling in 1910 and that it's a hotel now (Savill Court Hotel and Spa). Hotel doesn't meet GNG either. —МандичкаYO 😜 15:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete WP:SYN of material which is not directly about the subject.--Antigng (talk) 10:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.