In today's article we will explore the topic of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royaldutchshellplc.com (3rd nomination), a question that has sparked interest and debate for a long time.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royaldutchshellplc.com (3rd nomination) is a relevant and controversial topic that has captured the attention of academics, experts and the general public. Over the years,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royaldutchshellplc.com (3rd nomination) has been the subject of multiple investigations, studies and reflections, which have shed light on different aspects related to this topic. In this article, we will analyze the different perspectives and approaches that have been adopted to address
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royaldutchshellplc.com (3rd nomination), with the aim of deepening its understanding and scope.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Royal Dutch Shell. Missvain (talk) 23:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Royaldutchshellplc.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was created and largely contributed to by the owner of the website the article is about (Username on early contributions is identical to full name of website creator). It also seems non-notable, having little to no recent mainstream news coverage that I can find, and a large chunk of it's sources are links to shellnews.net, which according to this revision, is a website that is directly associated with the subject of this article. As far as I can tell this article was fully created to be an advertisement. thattransgirl (talk) (she/her) 13:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. thattransgirl (talk) (she/her) 13:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. thattransgirl (talk) (she/her) 13:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
In a prominent position on the royaldutchshellplc.com website there is a feature "Links to mass media coverage of our Shell websites". It provides access to numerous articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Dow Jones Newswires etc containing references to the website. Also numerous published books. Please forgive my lack of expertise in adding this information which might assist in deliberations. It is not my intention to add any further information to Wikipedia. Johnalfreddonovan (talk) 10:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.