In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Gillespie is a topic of great interest and relevance. For a long time,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Gillespie has captured the attention of people of all ages and social classes, generating debates, research and in-depth analysis in different areas. Whether due to its impact on society, its influence on popular culture, its importance in history, or any other reason,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Gillespie has managed to position itself as a fundamental topic in current discourse. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Gillespie, analyzing its impact, implications and relevance today.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) LibStar (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Rosemary Gillespie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I could not find significant coverage searching under "Rosemarie Gillespie", "Rosemary Gillespie" and "Waratah Rose" in google news and google books. As well as Australian database trove. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I found coverage of her on news sites as an author and human rights activist for PNG, Fiji and Indigenous Australians and citations of her books and articles. I can show her notability by expanding her article and adding more references over the next week so please do not delete. LPascal (talk) 01:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Substantial coverage in a range of sources, not least the parliamentary debate where the speaker says she " is well known to this country through her activism in the South Pacific and her current role in Bougainville, which has been going on for some time." PamD 08:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- I note that the article has been substantially upgraded and many more sources added since the nomination, and invite the nominator to consider withdrawing the AfD now that Gillespie's notability is better demonstrated. PamD 08:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree. This article should be kept. Bduke (talk) 08:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.