In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockwills group is a topic that has gained great relevance in various areas. From science to popular culture,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockwills group has captured the attention of experts and the general public. As time progresses,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockwills group continues to be a topic of interest and debate, influencing both individual decisions and public policies. In this article, we will explore the different facets of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockwills group, its implications and its impact on today's society. Through in-depth analysis, it seeks to shed light on this fascinating topic and its relevance to our daily lives.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
Delete, and salt all variations on the name. --MelanieN (talk) 16:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Rockwills group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No clear notability. Oscarthecat (talk) 07:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Besides this article, there is the twice-rejected draft at AfC (Draft:Rockwills, which has more references but was not deemed adequate by AfC reviewers in September) and a "Rockwills Group" article deleted at AfD on 24 October, and now this present version with the second title word in lower case, created on 3 November. The arguments at last month's AfD stand, complete failure of WP:CORPDEPTH, so this could probably go by CSD G4, but since it is here for second AfD, might WP:SALT on the name variations be appropriate too? AllyD (talk) 07:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.