Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution at Sea Saga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Revolution at Sea Saga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BKCRIT, not can I find any evidence of such notability. If anyone can provide content and references demonstrating notability I would support keeping it (or recreating it in the future). West Eddy (talk) 01:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:20, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

• Keep quite notable series--each of the books is in hundreds of libraries, and the necessary secondary sources are the reviews: We could merge to the author, but we'd need a redirect anyway--and there are enough books and they are well known enough to be appropriate for a separate article on each series, though not each book. DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC) .

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

• Redirect to author - I don't feel that reviews for books in the series (going by links provided above) go above WP:ROUTINE coverage and demonstrate notability of the series. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 23:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
• KeepA popular series of books, this article should be kept and improved on. The merge proposal will help improve the overall content. CouchSurfer222 (talk) 01:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
• Keep. While we don't keep articles because the subject is popular, reviews do count towards notability as long as they're by reliable sources per WP:NBOOK. However, I will admit that this just barely squeaks by notability standards by a hair's breadth.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.