Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Island Minerals

Nowadays, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Island Minerals is a topic that has aroused great interest in different areas. From politics to health, fashion and technology, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Island Minerals has become a recurring talking point. Opinions on this matter are varied and polarized, which has generated an enriching and, at times, heated debate. In this article, we will explore different perspectives on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Island Minerals and how it impacts our current society. In addition, we will analyze its evolution over the years and its projection for the future. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Island Minerals is a topic that leaves no one indifferent, and deserves deep and well-argued reflection.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Red Island Minerals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. Created by SPA COI editor. Little content. Little independent coverage. Rayman60 (talk) 15:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.