Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rappervil

Nowadays, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rappervil is a topic that has gained relevance in different areas. From politics to technology, culture and economics, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rappervil has become a central topic of discussion and debate. Its impact ranges from everyday aspects to large-scale issues, generating great interest from society in general. In this article, we will analyze various aspects related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rappervil, with the aim of obtaining a comprehensive and updated vision of its importance today.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested.  Sandstein  19:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Rappervil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did put up a BLP prod, but seems like refs were added-this is a rapper with questionable notability Wgolf (talk) 02:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

BTW-I only can find Twitter and Youtube links for this guy. Wgolf (talk) 02:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.