Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raindropss

In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raindropss is a topic of interest that has captured the attention of many people. Whether due to its relevance in society or its impact on daily life, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raindropss has generated a constant debate in different areas. From its influence in politics to its presence in the cultural sphere, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raindropss has managed to position itself as an issue of indisputable importance. Over the years, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raindropss has evolved and adapted to the changing demands of society, making it an extremely interesting topic and worthy of in-depth analysis. Through this article, we will explore the different facets of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raindropss and its impact on the world today.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Raindropss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG no significant coverage. Only the first hit in gnews could be considered indepth coverage but nothing more could be found. LibStar (talk) 01:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.