Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Finley

This article will address the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Finley, which has aroused great interest and controversy in various areas. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Finley has generated an intense debate in contemporary society, awakening the curiosity and opinion of specialists and the general public. Its relevance and significance have led to a deeper study and analysis, with the aim of understanding its impact and scope. In this sense, it is pertinent to examine in detail the different aspects surrounding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Finley, exploring its origin, evolution, repercussions and possible future scenarios. Likewise, it seeks to offer a comprehensive perspective that allows enriching knowledge about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Finley, providing elements that contribute to a critical and reflective analysis.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Rachael Finley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO - coverage is either lacking depth or not independent (e.g. interview-based articles). MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.