Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QMCSO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

QMCSO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Speedy deletion was declined, this reads like a cut and paste from a Government website. It doesn't seem like an encylopedia article. Pollytyred (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete cut and paste of this. Technically I don't think the text is copyrighted, but that doesn't mean it should just be randomly dumped into WP either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment Well found Starblind. Being a US government work it may be public domain? However no assertion of copyright ownership, and the originating website does not indicate GFDL so I suspect WP:CSD#G12 speedy may apply. Pedro :  Chat  15:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete whatever the case may be, it fails WP:NOT in its tone. Not written like an encyclopedia article.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic. KurtRaschke (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.