In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Pegasus has become a topic of increasing importance and interest for various areas of society. Both on a personal and professional level,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Pegasus plays a fundamental role in the development and evolution of people and communities. Throughout history,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Pegasus has been the subject of study, debate and analysis, and its influence extends to multiple disciplines, from science and technology to art and culture. In this article, we will explore in depth the impact of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Pegasus on today's society, addressing its implications, applications and challenges from different perspectives. Additionally, we will examine how
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Pegasus has shaped the way we think, act, and relate to the world around us, and how its continued evolution continues to impact our lives in significant ways.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Features of the Marvel Universe. Consensus is to merge to Features of the Marvel Universe (non-admin closure) ES&L 12:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Project Pegasus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This does not establish notability independent of Marvel Comics through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary.
I am also nominating the following related page because there is no need to list characters that appear by location in a fictional universe. The main Marvel character lists can handle them if they don't establish notability on their own:
- Characters of Project Pegasus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) TTN (talk) 22:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep or merge both into Features of the Marvel Universe. BOZ (talk) 12:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - Let this page stay. It's one of the important locations in Marvel Comics. If this is merged, where else are we supposed to put it's staff? Rtkat3 (talk 8:45, November 1 2013 (UTC)
- Merge both into Features of the Marvel Universe. Not independently notable, lacks sourcing, the above argument borders on WP:ILIKEIT. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Merge the main Project Pegasus article into a paragraph (deleting anything more than a paragraph) to Features of the Marvel Universe and then Delete the spin off article Characters of Project Pegasus which is nearly the definition of unsourced and unnotable Listcruft. Now a note for emphasis: I created the Project Pegasus article years ago, and recently I spun off the Characters page, and even *I* don't think they pass notability or many of Wikipedia's other guidelines. When I created the page in 2006, we were past Wikipedia 0.5 -- but not by much, and this was one of a number of articles that were created with the belief that they would be sourced and flushed out later. It is now 2013, and in over 6 years we still do not have a single citation showing significant coverage in a secondary source. This is not a notable topic. Instead, it is a small piece of comics trivia. And as to Rtkat3's argument "where else are we supposed to put..." this information, the answer is: On Marvel Comics' wiki, which is entirely available to anyone who wishes to find out information about this topic. This doesn't belong on Wikipedia unless it can stand up to Wikipedia's standards -Markeer 02:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.