In this article, we will explore the relevance of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perla Adea in various contexts and its impact on today's society.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perla Adea has captured the attention of many people in recent years, generating debates and reflections around its meaning and implications. Throughout history,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perla Adea has played a crucial role in the evolution of societies and the formation of individual and collective identities. From its emergence to the present,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perla Adea has been the object of study, admiration, controversy and reinterpretation in fields as diverse as science, technology, art, politics and popular culture. In this article, we will examine how
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perla Adea has shaped our world and will continue to do so in the future.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Perla Adea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of notability, 1st and 3rd links are simply someones opinion, 2nd link is a blog so thus not a WP:Reliable source, I can't find anything on Google so have to say Delete per GNG. –Davey2010Talk 00:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The first http://www.philstar.com article listed above only offers one paragraph on the subject while the second only mentions her briefly. http://starforallseasons.com/television/ only mentions the subject twice: it's not related to her. We need significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Granted, I did find some material on the subject online, but nothing to satisfy WP:GNG. However, sources do not have to be online, or even in English. If an editor can find books, publications (probably many in the 1960s) or similar content that discuss the subject I would be open to reviewing the additional content and changing my mind. Ping me if that happens. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:15, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.