Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parhlo

In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parhlo is a topic that has gained great relevance and has captured the attention of different sectors. From academia to the business world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parhlo has become a topic of constant discussion and growing interest. Over time, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parhlo has proven to have a significant impact on society, generating debates and reflections that transcend borders and cultures. In this article, we will explore the phenomenon of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parhlo in depth, analyzing its implications and influence on today's world.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Parhlo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. I removed some WP:FAKEREFerences but decided best to come to AfD instead of stripping the page. The WP:BEFORE search found interviews, quotes, and WP:NEWSORGINDIA but not the type of significant coverage needed to show notability. Maybe there are non-English references but I am unable to locate those from my search. CNMall41 (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.