Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangea
In today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangea is a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide spectrum of people. Whether due to its impact on society, its importance in history or its relevance in today's world, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangea has become a topic that arouses passions, conflicting opinions and heated debates. From academia to the workplace, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangea has managed to capture the attention and interest of experts and neophytes alike. In this article, we will explore different aspects of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangea, analyzing its impact on various spheres of life and its relevance to understanding the world around us.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was The result was speedy keep - even on April Fools' Day, redirects should be discussed at WP:RfD. 
ansh666 05:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- Pangea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NOTTEMPORARY, this super-continent is long gone, why do we insist on holding on to the past? It's notability is temporary, and has no reason to be included in Wikipedia as an article. --Nicereddy (talk) 04:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.