Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenVPN Over SSH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

OpenVPN Over SSH (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOT a guide or manual Gaijin42 (talk) 01:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 22:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 22:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 22:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• Delete, no indication of notability or even existence; not a single one of the references mentions this supposed encryption protocol. Huon (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
• Delete and draft/userfy if wished - I found no evidence of good third-party coverage even in the slightest. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
• Merge→OpenVPN: There seems to be enough reference material to support a brief implementation mode section in the OpenVPN article; would not support maintenance as a stand alone article at the present time based on available coverage. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC) @WikiVPN888:

I don't see violations, definitely should be kept. I've been searching for an article like this for months. The article is very informative, I'm not saying it's the best. It would be great if someone could edit and add more info but I don't see why should it be removed?

Asmaa.ispire (talk) 13:42, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Asmaa IbrahimAsmaa.ispire (talk) 13:42, 8 July 2015 (UTC) striking comment from blocked sockGaijin42 (talk) 18:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.