Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah McCullough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Noah McCullough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crystal ball article of a young author who, so far, has only accomplished making one book and there's not much else with this article existing since March 2007. My best searches found nothing to suggest better improvement here, here, here and here, This would even be best mentioning elsewhere but there's no good move target. SwisterTwister talk 04:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator. With respect to his television appearances, an argument might be made for turning this into a re-direct to the Tonight Show, because of the assertion of several appearances on it. But the article provides no source for this and, even if it did, the article on The Tonight Show doesn't mention the instant subject at all. So, a re-direct would serve no purpose and 'delete' is the better option here. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:12, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Rubbish computer 11:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
• DELETE as WP:TOOSOON. E.M.Gregory (talk) 02:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - Popularity isn't the same thing as notability. We can revisit the matter later based on the nature of his future career. As well, even though his debut book has attracted some attention, that's not the same thing as having an article on him. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:54, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.