In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedim Jahić (2nd nomination) has become a fundamental topic that covers different aspects of daily life. From its impact on society to its influence on the global economy,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedim Jahić (2nd nomination) has taken a predominant place in everyday conversations. As we delve into this fascinating world, it is essential to understand the importance of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedim Jahić (2nd nomination) and how it affects every aspect of our lives. In this article, we will explore in depth the different facets of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedim Jahić (2nd nomination) and its relevance in today's world, providing a comprehensive overview that will allow our readers to better understand this exciting topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Aside from the hoax concerns, it seems like even the non-hoax topic doesn't meet notability guidelines Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Nedim Jahić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Interwiki hoax. City Records doesn't list him as one of their artists. He didn't star in San Andreas, 10 Cloverfield Lane, Kong: Skull Island, Halloween or any film listed in filmography. IMDb accredits him with only a minor role in a Serbian TV series. Those awards are pure jokes. Alexandru M. (talk) 21:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn as hoax material was removed.Delete as hoax. Most other wiki articles don't even mention him as an actor. Also, the German Wiki article is up for deletion as well.--Auric talk 16:18, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The original article, which I have restored, was about a Bosnian analyst, not an actor. The article was hijacked by DavidBEKT, who I will be blocking shortly, to add the hoax material about an actor.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:17, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Even after the revert operated by Ponyo, the notability of this journalist is not supported by sources. A summary biography can be found on Al Jazeera, but that doesn't mean he's more remarkable than other journalists affiliated with Al Jazeera that don't have an article on Wikipedia. Other summary biography is provided by Kosovo 2.0, without exemplifying his "various civic initiatives in Bosnia and Herzegovina, mostly related to human rights, political freedoms and war crimes." Alexandru M. (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
- Please also have a look at Draft:Nedim Jahić Jonas. Don't know te policy for drafts, but it's the same.--Fano (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
- "Page does not exist"... 😒 Alexandru M. (talk) 13:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- It's been deleted, but an IP recently added a version of it to the article.--Auric talk 18:25, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- comment I just declined a speedy deletion request, because I think thyat, giving thios is already open, the discussion should carry on, based on the notability issue. Or maybe a wp:IAR speedy relist...? - Nabla (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Two sentences does not an encyclopedic article make WP:2S - while his work may be noble, he lacks notability under WP:BASIC (no "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject") - does not meet WP:ANYBIO (has not "received a well-known and significant award or honor") - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 03:15, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:RS and WP:BASIC. The human rights activist nor the actor are notable. Mysticair667537 (talk) 03:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Entirely unsuited for any encyclopaedia. Subject fails all criteria for notability. -The Gnome (talk) 12:54, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete Despite it's existence everywhere xwiki, this was a massive spam/hoax campaign (essentially) by the subject that unfortunately got picked up repeatedly by good faith users and bots translating. Praxidicae (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC)- I see now that this was hijacked, then subsequently created xwiki on languages that did not have existing articles about the actual subject. Pretty clever. I have no opinion on whether the original subject (an activist) is notable or not but I'm striking my delete !vote as it was about the hijacked subject. Praxidicae (talk) 14:37, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.