Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Pleasant Baptist Church's theme is one that has captured the attention of millions around the world. From his impact on society to his influence on popular culture,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Pleasant Baptist Church has left an indelible mark on history. In this article we will explore in depth the most relevant aspects of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Pleasant Baptist Church, from its origins to its evolution over time. Through exclusive interviews, extensive research and detailed analysis, we will reveal the true importance of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Pleasant Baptist Church and its impact on the modern world.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Mount Pleasant Baptist Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Most of the sources are not independent as Christian press. The only independent source is ABC but it's a one line mention of the church. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 14:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. The nominator makes a serious error. Christian media are generally independent of what they cover, unless a denomination or house of worship is talking about itself. Otherwise, they are media just like any other. As a reminder, Wikipedia has many articles about individual churches, and since this one is located in a prosperous English-speaking country, it is no surprise that there are abundant references available about it. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: not a run-of-the-mill church, and Eternity News is an independent, reliable source; the nominator appears to misunderstand our WP:RS guideline. StAnselm (talk) 21:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Eastmain and StAnselm. Deus et lex (talk) 07:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Eastmain and StAnselm. Cabrils (talk) 08:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Eastmain and StAnselm.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.