Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorola Razr foldable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 04:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Motorola Razr foldable (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the information are based on rumors. I propose that this article is deleted until Motorola officially announces the phone. jaclar0529 (talk) 09:21, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. jaclar0529 (talk) 09:21, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

• Move Perhaps this article should not be deleted rather moved to draft space until the subject is more notable. EvilxFish (talk) 09:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. I'm not sure what this editor's point is in mass creating poorly referenced stubs about new android phones, with numerous spelling and grammar issues. Please ping me if this goes to ANI or something. That said, phone is notable, easily passing GNG and SIGCOV with breathless non-stop coverage. Even if it doesn't actually get released, this doesn't violate CRYSTALBALL. The only reason to delete would be to motivate another editor to recreate a better article.Hydromania (talk) 05:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• Speedy keep: The phone is now announced and confirmed officially as of today, meaning that the argument for deletion is no longer valid. ViperSnake151  Talk  06:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Motorola Mobility/Lenovo has officially announced the phone and also released a video. So has Verizon. It has received significant coverage from the press. Even on the date of the nomination, it should have qualified to stay. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Seeing as the phone is now confirmed and received a considerable amount of press coverage already the article should be kept. JayJay^{What did I do?} 21:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Cnet has already released material about this device. That means that people outside motorola have touched it and that the phone actually exists. Pancho507 (talk) 02:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.