In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss USA 2016 plays a vital role in people's daily lives. Whether through its influence on popular culture, its impact on society or its relevance in the professional field,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss USA 2016 is a topic that does not go unnoticed. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss USA 2016, from its origin and evolution to its importance in today's world. Through the analysis of different perspectives and concrete examples, we will seek to understand the true relevance of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss USA 2016 in our daily lives.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus, though slim, is to keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 21:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Miss USA 2016 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Crystal bol with no date or venue known. No independent sources conform WP:RS. Created by a now blocked sockpuppet. Article might be unreliable due to edits of an editor who is placing misinformation and hoaxes The Banner talk 12:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Strong keep as subject easily crosses verifiability and notability thresholds. Satisfying point 1 of WP:CRYSTAL, this event is both notable and "almost certain" to take place. Widespread news coverage like this and this confirm the new broadcast contracts and this will be the 65th in an annual series of such events. Coverage of individual contestants is also easy to find and will only proliferate as more state winners are chosen. I have added several reliable sources to the article. - Dravecky (talk) 10:50, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Strong Keep: The subject is notable and verifiable. It will be held within 12 months and is properly sourced. { } 13:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - This is one of those events that are notable, Admittingly sourcing's not amazing but notability does seem to be there. –Davey2010Talk 00:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.