Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Rowley
In the article we present today we are going to address the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Rowley, a topic that has aroused the interest of many people throughout history. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Rowley is a complex and fascinating topic that covers a wide range of aspects and has repercussions in various areas of society. Over the years, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Rowley has been the subject of numerous studies, debates and controversies, which has contributed to enriching our understanding of this topic. In this article, we propose to explore different facets related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Rowley, from its origin to its impact today, offering a comprehensive vision and diverse perspectives that allow the reader to delve into this exciting topic.
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 May 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 03:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Max Rowley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage found in searches. Fails GNG. Also unsourced for 12 years. SK2242 (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 13:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet GNG. This actually actually dates back over 16 years. The 12 and a half years is how long it has been tagged as lacking adequate sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 15:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SNOW, and I would add in specifically WP:SIGCOV. Bearian (talk) 17:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.