In today's world,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo Mercurio has become a topic of great relevance and interest to society in general. Since its inception,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo Mercurio has captured the attention of people of all ages and profiles, generating debate and reflection around its different aspects. Whether due to its impact on culture, its relevance in the scientific field, or its influence on the history of humanity,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo Mercurio has managed to transcend borders and generations, becoming a fundamental topic that continues to arouse interest and curiosity. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the different aspects related to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo Mercurio, delving into its meaning, importance and impact in the contemporary world.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 01:31, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Massimo Mercurio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Author apparently got impatient waiting for an AfD AfC review, I'm unable to find, and the article doesn't provide, sources to references which would evidence notability under our general notability guideline. There may very well be such sources, of course, language barriers may be at issue. j⚛e deckertalk 18:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (speak) @ 19:59, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA biography written in PR prose: "eternal city of Rome", "comprehensive art solutions provider" (presumably not meaning turps and white spirit) and sourced to primary sources. Multiple searches are not turning up anything better. Fails WP:BIO. AllyD (talk) 17:47, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Agree: AllyD summed it up nicely. The draft was not accepted and the author moved it into the article space themself. It may be worth putting it back into AfC and seeing if the author can improve on it, but it does not belong in the article space. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 03:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment No one has stated what language they tried to find sources in - English or Italian. If no English sources can be found, perhaps Italian? And if Italian, maybe this article is better suited at the Italian Wikipedia? Just a thought. ArcAngel (talk) ) 15:17, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.